Re: OpenSSL 3.0.0 compatibility

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Laurenz Albe
Тема Re: OpenSSL 3.0.0 compatibility
Дата
Msg-id 1c5e12775af688bcd086a1976902f01996bba526.camel@cybertec.at
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на OpenSSL 3.0.0 compatibility  (Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>)
Ответы Re: OpenSSL 3.0.0 compatibility  (Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Fri, 2020-05-29 at 00:16 +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> Since OpenSSL is now releasing 3.0.0-alpha versions, I took a look at using it
> with postgres to see what awaits us.  As it is now shipping in releases (with
> GA planned for Q4), users will probably soon start to test against it so I
> wanted to be prepared.
> 
> Regarding the deprecations, we can either set preprocessor directives or use
> compiler flags to silence the warning and do nothing (for now), or we could
> update to the new API.  We probably want to different things for master vs
> back-branches, but as an illustration of what the latter could look like I've
> implemented this in 0001.

An important question will be: if we convert to functions that are not deprecated,
what is the earliest OpenSSL version we can support?

Yours,
Laurenz Albe




В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Masahiko Sawada
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Internal key management system
Следующее
От: "matsumura.ryo@fujitsu.com"
Дата:
Сообщение: RE: archive status ".ready" files may be created too early