Re: BUG #8516: Calling VOLATILE from STABLE function

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Dwayne Towell
Тема Re: BUG #8516: Calling VOLATILE from STABLE function
Дата
Msg-id 1c4601cec60d$ed9bfaa0$c8d3efe0$@docketnavigator.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: BUG #8516: Calling VOLATILE from STABLE function  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Список pgsql-bugs
> According to the documentation, f() should be marked VOLATILE also, since
> calling f() produces side effects. PostgreSQL does not give a warning (or
> better yet, an error); I think it should.

I think the answer is that function authors are required to prevent
functions they mark as STABLE from calling VOLATILE functions.

--

I understand it's an error (at least usually), my question/issue is why does
PostgreSQL NOT give at least a warning when a programmer (probably
accidentally) calls a VOLATILE function in one that he has specifically
tagged as STABLE? The compiler has all the information to notify the
programmer of a mistake, but isn't. This violates a fundamental principle of
software engineering--take every opportunity to prevent errors.

Dwayne

В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: BUG #8516: Calling VOLATILE from STABLE function
Следующее
От: david.kumar@vsoftcorp.com
Дата:
Сообщение: BUG #8518: FreeBSD usage in 9.3.1