"Bob Badour" <bbadour@golden.net> wrote in message news:<XJGdnSwNRq8UxxaiU-KYuA@golden.net>...
> "Mike Preece" <michael@preece.net> wrote in message
> news:1b0b566c.0310131551.47ca0d47@posting.google.com...
> > dwolt@iserv.net (Dawn M. Wolthuis) wrote in message
> news:<6db906b2.0310130618.6920e737@posting.google.com>...
> > > Bob Badour" <bbadour@golden.net> wrote in message
> news:<O6WdnZ4P-_6I4RWiXTWJlg@golden.net>...
> > > > "Dawn M. Wolthuis" <dwolt@iserv.net> wrote in message
> > > > news:6db906b2.0310100813.65b872d8@posting.google.com...
> > > > > Thank you, Seun, for asking your question with a bit of logic and
> not
> > > > > gut-reaction emotional baggage (and for also asking a question of me
> > > > > off-list so I could ramble). I'll try to make this more suscinct.
> > > >
> > > > With all due respect, Dawn, you are an idiot. That statement has
> nothing to
> > > > do with my viscera or with my emotions; I write it with complete
> dispassion.
> > > > You simply are an idiot, and Seun simply lacks sufficient education to
> > > > recognize that fact from what you have written.
> > >
> > > Thanks for the clarification, Bob. What seemed like an emotional
> > > outburst from me was actually a logically-derived statement regarding
> > > my capacity then, right? If I were you, I might be just a tad bit
> > > concerned that I have taught many engineers calculus and you are
> > > flying on planes or driving over bridges they designed. Let's hope
> > > they learned it well in spite of me, eh? smiles.
> > > --dawn
> > >
> > > Dawn M. Wolthuis
> >
> > Dawn: I'm sure you're not an idiot.
>
> Mike, you have expressed certainty contradicting the patently obvious
> before. Your opinion is only a useful gauge insofar as you are wrong so much
> more frequently than you are correct.
Dawn: Bob professes to respect referential integrity!?