Re: Postgres is not able to handle more than 4k tables!?

On 7/8/20 11:41 PM, Konstantin Knizhnik wrote:
>
> So looks like NUM_LOCK_PARTITIONS and MAXNUMMESSAGES  constants have 
> to be replaced with GUCs.
> To avoid division, we can specify log2 of this values, so shift can be 
> used instead.
> And MAX_SIMUL_LWLOCKS should be defined as NUM_LOCK_PARTITIONS + 
> NUM_INDIVIDUAL_LWLOCKS + NAMED_LWLOCK_RESERVE.
>
Because I was involved in this particular case and don`t want it to 
became a habit, I`m volunteering to test whatever patch this discussion 
will produce.

-- 
Grigory Smolkin
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company