Re: [HACKERS] Re: Alter subscription..SET - NOTICE message is comingfor table which is already removed

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Eisentraut
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Re: Alter subscription..SET - NOTICE message is comingfor table which is already removed
Дата
Msg-id 1a9ddc76-2e4b-3b1e-acb4-0774fe21507e@2ndquadrant.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на [HACKERS] Re: Alter subscription..SET - NOTICE message is coming for tablewhich is already removed  (Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Re: Alter subscription..SET - NOTICE message is comingfor table which is already removed  (Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 6/3/17 01:04, Noah Misch wrote:
> On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 10:15:50PM -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> On 5/30/17 13:25, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
>>> I think this cause is that the relation status entry could be deleted
>>> by ALTER SUBSCRIPTION REFRESH before corresponding table sync worker
>>> starting. Attached patch fixes issues reported on this thread so far.
>>
>> This looks like a reasonable change, but it conflicts with the change
>> discussed on "logical replication - still unstable after all these
>> months".  I think I'll deal with that one first.
> 
> The above-described topic is currently a PostgreSQL 10 open item.  You own
> this open item.  Please observe the policy on open item ownership and send a
> status update within three calendar days of this message.  Include a date for
> your subsequent status update.

I'm working on this now and will report back tomorrow.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Should we standardize on a type for signal handlerflags?
Следующее
От: David Fetter
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Parallel Aggregation support for aggregate functionsthat use transitions not implemented for array_agg