Re: strange perf regression with data checksums
От | Tomas Vondra |
---|---|
Тема | Re: strange perf regression with data checksums |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1a5b4b3c-7fe7-45c6-ae27-7129cd85ce5c@vondra.me обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: strange perf regression with data checksums (Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander@timescale.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: strange perf regression with data checksums
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, We had a RMT meeting yesterday, and we briefly discussed whether the v2 patch should go into PG18. And we concluded we probably should try to do that. On the one hand, it's not a PG18-specific bug, in the sense that older releases are affected the same way. But it requires data checksums to be enabled, and a lot of systems runs with checksums=off, simply because that's the default. But 18 will (likely) change that. We didn't get any complaints about this (at least I'm not aware of any), but I suppose that's simply because people didn't have a comparison, and treated it as "normal". But with the default changes, it'll be easier to spot once they upgrade to PG18. So better to get this in now, otherwise we may have to wait until PG19, because of ABI (the patch adds a field into BTScanPosData, but maybe it'd be possible to add it into padding, not sure). regards -- Tomas Vondra
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: