It worked, and I must have done something wrong. I'm probably not the only person who would find something like the
followinghelpful:
division (integer division truncates the result) 10/3 3
division (with decimal results) 10/3::numeric 3.3333
division (rounded) round(10/3::numeric, 2) 3.33
From an end user's the question "how do I divide two integers and limit the number of decimals" is surely a common one.
And if you look it up somewhere, division is probably the search word. Now you could argue that the user should
alreadyknow about formatting and rounding. But some don't.
If you wanted to look up a rare wordform in a famous early 20th century dictionary of Old English, you had to know the
rootform of the word. If you already knew the root form, there is a good chance that you didn't need to look it up in
thefirst place. If you didn't know the root form, the dictionary was no use.
In this, single stop shopping for the three most common problems of simple division makes life easier for users.
On 12/4/18, 3:06 PM, "David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 1:57 PM Martin Mueller
<martinmueller@northwestern.edu> wrote:
>
> I didn't formulate my question properly, because the query went like
> "select alldefects /wordcount"
> where alldefects and wordcount are integers. But none of the different ways of putting the double colon seemed
towork.
IDK...the first thing that came to mind was to just stick it at the
end of the expression:
select x/y::numeric from (values (10,4)) vals (x,y)
And it worked...
If you want to propose a concrete documentation patch more power to
you but this doesn't come up enough to think that what we have is
materially deficient. I'm sorry you are having trouble with it but
the lists do provide quick and customized answers for situations like
this.
David J.