RE: [HACKERS] Docs

Thanks, everybody, I think I have enough info now to start documenting the
changes that I've made so far.

MikeA


>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Thomas Lockhart [mailto:lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu]
>> Sent: Monday, January 03, 2000 10:20 AM
>> To: Ed Loehr
>> Cc: Ansley, Michael; 'pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org'
>> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Docs
>> 
>> 
>> > > > Another question...  how do people normally edit the 
>> docs?  Is there an sgml
>> > > > editor that I can use, or should I do it in some other 
>> format, and have it
>> > > > converted, or what?
>> > > As Vince mentioned, xemacs is the first choice.
>> > Now, don't go startin' no feud here... if you need a space 
>> shuttle, xemacs is
>> > it.  But if you need the One True Editor, well, of 
>> course...it's vi/vim. :)
>> 
>> Michael wasn't asking for a space shuttle, but he *was* 
>> asking for "an
>> sgml editor", which implied to me an editor with some knowledge of
>> sgml notation. afaik The AntiEditor is the only freeware tool to do
>> this...
>> 
>> btw, xemacs is preferred over emacs since the xemacs "version 6"
>> implementation of DTD parsing can handle the DocBook DTD, whereas the
>> newer emacs "version 7" implementation barfs with some internal array
>> error when reading our docs after parsing the DTD. These are recent
>> results from my Mandrake/RedHat-6.1 Linux distro.
>> 
>>                     - Thomas
>> 
>> -- 
>> Thomas Lockhart                
>> lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu
>> South Pasadena, California
>> 
>> ************
>>