Re: timestamp format bug

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Roberts, Jon
Тема Re: timestamp format bug
Дата
Msg-id 1A6E6D554222284AB25ABE3229A92762715527@nrtexcus702.int.asurion.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: timestamp format bug  ("Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>)
Ответы Re: timestamp format bug  ("Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>)
Список pgsql-hackers
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kevin Grittner [mailto:Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov]
> Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2008 12:33 PM
> To: Roberts, Jon; pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: RE: [HACKERS] timestamp format bug
>
> >>> On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 12:28 PM, in message
> <1A6E6D554222284AB25ABE3229A92762715525@nrtexcus702.int.asurion.com>,
> "Roberts,
> Jon" <Jon.Roberts@asurion.com> wrote:
> > The default timestamp format appears to be yyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss.ms
>
> Not to me:
>
> select now();
>               now
> -------------------------------
>  2008-01-31 12:31:40.568746-06
> (1 row)
>

I'm guessing that is a server setting on how to format a timestamp.
Your appears to be yyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss.us.


So on your db, run this query:
select sub.t1, to_char(t1, 'yyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss.us') as char_t1
from
(
select timestamp'2008-01-31 12:31:40.500000' as t1
) sub


I bet you get this:
"2008-01-31 12:31:40.50";"2008-01-31 12:31:40.500000"

Don't you think it should have two identical columns?

Secondly, this link shows that ms should be 000-999 and us should be
000000-999999.

http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.2/static/functions-formatting.html


All of the other fields are padded like month, day, year, hour, minute,
and second and are consistent.  The formats ms and us should be
consistent too.



Jon


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Kevin Grittner"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: timestamp format bug
Следующее
От: "Kevin Grittner"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: timestamp format bug