Re: dead tuple difference between pgstattuple and pg_stat_user_tables
От | Adrian Klaver |
---|---|
Тема | Re: dead tuple difference between pgstattuple and pg_stat_user_tables |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 19c4824f-24b8-4561-81c3-a2f4a7949803@aklaver.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | dead tuple difference between pgstattuple and pg_stat_user_tables (Matthew Tice <mjtice@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: dead tuple difference between pgstattuple and pg_stat_user_tables
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On 8/23/24 09:14, Matthew Tice wrote: > Hi All, > > I'm trying to understand why there's a difference between what > pgstattuple reports and pg_stat_user_tables reports (for the number of > dead tuples). > > As I understand, pgstattuple and pgstattuple_approx return the exact > number of dead tuples (as noted in the documentation) and based on an https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/pgstattuple.html pgstattuple_approx(regclass) returns record pgstattuple_approx is a faster alternative to pgstattuple that returns approximate results. Not sure how you get exact count out of that? > This is a Google Alloy DB instance running: https://cloud.google.com/alloydb/docs/overview "AlloyDB for PostgreSQL is a fully managed, PostgreSQL-compatible database service that's designed for your most demanding workloads, including hybrid transactional and analytical processing. AlloyDB pairs a Google-built database engine with a cloud-based, multi-node architecture to deliver enterprise-grade performance, reliability, and availability." Where the important parts are 'PostgreSQL-compatible' and 'Google-built database engine'. You probably need to reach out to Google to see what that means for this situation. > > select version(); > -[ RECORD 1 ]------------------------- > version | PostgreSQL 14.10 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by Debian > clang version 12.0.1, 64-bit > SELECT 1 -- Adrian Klaver adrian.klaver@aklaver.com
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: