The real issue is to make sure there is only one Implementation of
the protocol. Currently the patch duplicates the protocol in it's own
handler.
If you could fold the COPY protocol into the QueryExecutor that would
be a good start. Then we can argue about the API.
DAVE
On 16-May-06, at 3:05 PM, A.M. wrote:
> Is there a posting detailing the agreed upon API? I would like this so
> much, I would be willing to work on it.
>
> -M
>
> On Tue, May 16, 2006 2:43 pm, Kris Jurka wrote:
>>
>
>>
>> On Tue, 16 May 2006, A.M. wrote:
>>
>>
>>> I would like to be able to use COPY operations from JDBC. I searched
>>> the archives and the last time it came up was August 2005. Everyone
>>> seems to be in agreement that it would come in handy, patches are
>>> available, but the indecision seems to be how to expose the COPY
>>> API. Is
>>> this correct?
>>
>> Originally yes, but at this point I think we've resigned ourselves to
>> putting out whatever we can rather than working on the more
>> complicated
>> API. The problem is really a matter of time and interest. All of
>> the
>> maintainers are very busy and can barely keep up with existing bug
>> reports
>> and list traffic.
>>
>> Kris Jurka
>>
>>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of
> broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
>