Re: [HACKERS] psql vs. gcc

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: [HACKERS] psql vs. gcc
Дата
Msg-id 199912171743.MAA17046@candle.pha.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] psql vs. gcc  (Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>)
Список pgsql-hackers
I accidentally rejected the proper fix for this yesterday because there
was no description about what it was supposed to fix.  Let me see if I
can get it now.


> > If I compile current source, gcc (2.95.2) return interesting error for
> > pgsql/describe.c.
> > The gcc return error for next lines:
> >         strcpy(buf,
> >            "SELECT pg_database.datname as \"Database\",\n"
> >                    "       pg_user.usename as \"Owner\""
> > #ifdef MULTIBYTE
> >                    ",\n       pg_database.encoding as \"Encoding\""
> > #endif
> >                 );
> 
> I'm sure we would accept a patch that changed this into a
> 
>   strcpy()
>   #ifdef MULTIBYTE
>   strcat()
>   #endif
> 
> sequence rather than this monolithic line.
> 
>                     - Thomas
> 
> -- 
> Thomas Lockhart                lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu
> South Pasadena, California
> 
> ************
> 


--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us            |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] LONG varsize - how to go on
Следующее
От: wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Re: Notation for nextval() (was Re: Several small patches)