Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] uniqueness not always correct

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] uniqueness not always correct
Дата
Msg-id 199912160129.UAA11666@candle.pha.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] uniqueness not always correct  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Fixed by recently submitted patch.


> Vadim Mikheev <vadim@krs.ru> writes:
> > Yes, I reproduced this (Solaris 2.5/sparc).
> > Seems like CIDR problem(??!):
>
> Yes.  Looks like the low-order bits of a CIDR address are garbage,
> but network_cmp() compares them as though all bits are significant.
> So, indeed, it may think two different instances of '1.2.3/24'
> are not equal.
>
> The regular inet comparison functions at least *try* to mask out
> garbage bits, but I think they get it wrong too --- they should be
> taking the smaller of ip_bits(a1) and ip_bits(a2) as the number of
> bits to compare.  They don't.  Thus, for example,
>
> regression=> select '1.2.5/16'::cidr < '1.2.3/24'::cidr;
> ?column?
> --------
> f
> (1 row)
>
> which looks wrong to me.
>
> In short, it's a bug in the inet data types, not a generic problem
> with unique indexes.
>
>             regards, tom lane
>
> ************
>


--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle
  maillist@candle.pha.pa.us            |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump --help
Следующее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] uniqueness not always correct