> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > > Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I don't see the same __arm32_ defines I have in 7.0 tree.
> > >
> > > You don't see them in REL6_5_PATCHES, you mean? So, you only applied
> > > them to CURRENT?
> >
> > Yes, only current. I suspect the original patch was too risky for the
> > stable tree.
>
> Ok; I am shipping those patches with the 6.5.3 RPM's. There are not
> major changes made by them -- just minor defines, the linux_arm
> template, etc. Do you want to re-review them for inclusion in
> REL6_5_PATCHES, or just wait?? They're only 2K.
We never seem to understand all the affects patches have, especially
when they affect s_lock.c or s_lock.h. Don't�think they should appear
in 6.5.*. We can make a separate patch for ARM and put it in the
patches directory like we did for Alpha.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026