> As far as I can see, the only thing that's really at stake here is not
> hardwiring the semantics of the operator names "<", "=", ">" into the
> system. While that'd be nice from a cleanliness/data-type-independence
> point of view, it's not clear that it has any real practical
> significance. Any data type designer who didn't make "=" mean equals
> ought to be shot anyway ;-). So upon second thought I think I'd put
> this *way* down the to-do list...
Removed from TODO list.
-- Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026