Re: [HACKERS] pgaccess seems a tad confused

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: [HACKERS] pgaccess seems a tad confused
Дата
Msg-id 199909170411.AAA06957@candle.pha.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на pgaccess seems a tad confused  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] pgaccess seems a tad confused  (Brook Milligan <brook@biology.nmsu.edu>)
Список pgsql-hackers
> 1. Why did the new pgaccess get installed into REL6_5 branch but not
> main development branch?
> 

No sense putting in development because there will probably be a newer
version by the time 6.6 is released, no?

> 2. New pgaccess no longer has a Makefile in src/bin/pgaccess, which
> is a problem because src/bin/Makefile tries to run a sub-make in that
> directory when configured --with-tcl.  Lack of the sub-Makefile looks
> bogus to me; it may not need to do anything for "make all" but it sure
> ought to do something for "make install", no?

Yes.  I was not in favor of adding new pgaccess in 6.5.2, but was
out-voted.

I have re-added the Makefile that appeared in the development tree.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us            |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: attdisbursion
Следующее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [QUESTIONS] errors on transactions and locks ?