[Charset iso-8859-1 unsupported, filtering to ASCII...]
> >> > The goal used to be a major release every three months, but we haven't
> >> > met that in some time. And, since it seems like we are now putting
> >> > out major releases in order to do significant upgrades and not just
> >> > incremental stability improvements, I kinda think that a slower cycle
> >> > (six-month intervals, say) might be a more useful goal at this stage.
> >> > Has the core group thought about this issue lately?
> >>
> >> I got a good laugh on this one. That we actually planned ahead... :-)
>
> Maybe the core team should take a look at the TODO list, and split it over
> the next couple of release cycles. Then you can just say, when a and b and
> c have been achieved, and are stable, then we release 6.x
I would be nice if we could do that, but people work as they have time
and interest in certain areas. Also, things get fixed as people find
problems and we become more capable with the source code.
Hard to plan any of that.
-- Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026