Re: [GENERAL] JOIN exclusion problem
| От | Anja Speerforck |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [GENERAL] JOIN exclusion problem |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 199907011559.LAA21556@chet.brysonweb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | JOIN exclusion problem (Anja Speerforck <anja@damn.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-general |
At 12:42 01.07.99 +0200, you wrote: >select ... from a, b where a.x=b.x >union >select ... from a, c where a.x=c.x > >is this what you wanted to achieve? Actually, more like select ... from a, b where a.x=b.x union select ... from a, c where a.y=c.y As Chris Bitmead wrote: >The problem is you've got two different result sets you need here..... >You either need to break it into two separate queries or else make it >into a UNION. If it's a UNION you will need to specify explicity what to >put into k.name when joining with agenturen. I'm guessing that you want >it blank in such a case. Which is correct. I did try it as a UNION, and this didn't work since I do need k.name to be blank. I believe the solution is in fact two separate queries. We're trying that now.... Anja
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: