Re: [HACKERS] current CVS snapshot of pgsql crash ...
От
Bruce Momjian
Тема
Re: [HACKERS] current CVS snapshot of pgsql crash ...
Дата
Msg-id
199906030016.UAA21358@candle.pha.pa.us
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
current CVS snapshot of pgsql crash ... David Sauer <davids@orfinet.cz>
Re: [HACKERS] current CVS snapshot of pgsql crash ... Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] current CVS snapshot of pgsql crash ... Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] current CVS snapshot of pgsql crash ... Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] current CVS snapshot of pgsql crash ... wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
Re: [HACKERS] current CVS snapshot of pgsql crash ... Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] current CVS snapshot of pgsql crash ... Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] current CVS snapshot of pgsql crash ... Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] current CVS snapshot of pgsql crash ... Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] current CVS snapshot of pgsql crash ... Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] current CVS snapshot of pgsql crash ... Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>
> David Sauer writes: > > david=> select textout(byteaout(odata)) from xinv18986; > > pqReadData() -- backend closed the channel unexpectedly. > > I think this is not related to large objects per se --- it's a > typechecking failure. textout is expecting a text datum, and it's > not getting one because that's not what comes out of byteaout. > (The proximate cause of the crash is that textout tries to interpret > the first four bytes of byteaout's output as a varlena length...) > > The parser's typechecking machinery is unable to catch this > error because textout is declared to take any parameter type > whatever (its proargtype is 0). > > Why don't the type output functions have the correct input types > declared for them in pg_proc??? > > For that matter, why do we allow user expressions to call the type > input/output functions at all? They're not really usable as SQL > functions AFAICS... Yes, they take C pointers, don't they. You can't return one of those in any SQL function or column name. -- Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления