Re: [HACKERS] inet data type regression test fails
От | Tatsuo Ishii |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] inet data type regression test fails |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 199905110054.JAA00849@ext16.sra.co.jp обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] inet data type regression test fails (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] inet data type regression test fails
Re: [HACKERS] inet data type regression test fails |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> > > > int addr = htonl(ntohl(ip_v4addr(ip)) | (0xffffffff >> ip_bits(ip))); > > > > There needs to be a UL on the end of that constant. Otherwise it depends > > on whether or not the compiler chooses to make it signed or unsigned. Not > > only that, but shifting by >=32 is undefined... Intel chipsets will go mod > > 32 and change 32 to 0. > > > > Anyone want to supply a patch? This has been already fixed. Now it looks like: unsigned long mask = 0xffffffff; if (ip_bits(ip) < 32) mask >>= ip_bits(ip); addr = htonl(ntohl(ip_v4addr(ip)) | mask); --- Tatsuo Ishii
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: