Re: [HACKERS] Another new regress test

> (A very short-term answer would be to turn on the checks anyway, and
> put the known exception cases into the expected outputs for the tests.
> That's pretty ugly, not to mention a pain to maintain, but it might be
> a reasonable thing to do if we aren't going to implement a better
> solution soon...)

Or, you could eliminate those types in the WHERE clause.  That may be
easier to maintain.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us            |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026