Re: [HACKERS] 64-bit hashjoins

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: [HACKERS] 64-bit hashjoins
Дата
Msg-id 199903250440.XAA04005@candle.pha.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] 64-bit hashjoins  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
> Walk through that with attlen = 32, attalign = 'i', and guess what:
> it applies LONGALIGN().  Which is different on Alpha than everywhere
> else, not to mention flat-out wrong for the given arguments.
> 
> Erik, try changing that last LONGALIGN to INTALIGN and see if it
> works any better on the Alpha.
> 
> We probably really ought to bag this entire logic and replace it
> with something like
>         attalign 'c' -> no alignment
>         attalign 's' -> SHORTALIGN
>         attalign 'i' -> INTALIGN
>         attalign 'd' -> DOUBLEALIGN
> with possibly some AssertMacro cross-checks that the given attlen
> makes sense for the attalign.  But driving the logic primarily off
> attlen rather than attalign makes little sense to me.

I can agree that the type alignment is clearly wrong.  I did some
cleanup of the pg_* files to they at least match, but that was obviously
not the whole picture, and this flakeyness has given us problems on
alpha.


--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us            |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] 64-bit hashjoins
Следующее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] static oid