Re: [HACKERS] to text or not to text
| От | Bruce Momjian |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] to text or not to text |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 199903222354.SAA24257@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | to text or not to text (Vince Vielhaber <vev@michvhf.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
> > The docs say that the text type is the "Best choice" of the character data > types. It was always my understanding that the text type was stored else- > where in the database and a pointer to it was stored in the actual table. > Does PostgreSQL do this or is a more efficient way been found? It seems > that it'd be too expensive to store it elsewhere. I'm making some changes > to a table and wanted to optomize it (varchar vs text). Internally, text is stored just like char(). Only large objects are stored outside the database. -- Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania19026
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: