Re: [HACKERS] Unary % operator is broken in current sources

> Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > OK, I made the change.  It works now with special entries for %4 and 4%
> > in the grammer, similar to our handling of -4:
> 
> Hmm, is that an adequate solution?  Are you sure there are no other
> operators like % ?

Not sure.  I know I only changed % to have precedence like /.  No one is
complaining, and I think the problems are restricted to +,-,*,/, and %. 
Should I fix any of these other ones?

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us            |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026