> Agreed, this is ok as long as
>
> vac=> create table table1 (field1 int);
> CREATE
> vac=> insert into table1 values (1);
> INSERT 1583349 1
> vac=> create index i_table1__field1 on table1 (field1);
> CREATE
> vac=> explain select * from table1 where field1 = 1;
> NOTICE: QUERY PLAN:
>
> Seq Scan on table1 (cost=1.03 size=1 width=4)
>
> - SeqScan is used for small tables.
>
> So, only bug reported is left.
My guess is that the creation of the index updates the table size
statistics.
However, when I see zero size, I don't know if it is accurate, or if
someone has added rows since the last vacuum/index creation, so I think
it is correct to use an index on a zero-length table if it is
appropriate. If the size is 1, I will assume that number is accurate,
and do a sequential scan.
Does that make sense?
-- Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026