Re: [HACKERS] palloc.h again

On Sun, Mar 07, 1999 at 02:22:28PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Wait a sec ... ecpg?  ecpg shouldn't be depending on backend internals
> at all, should it?  I thought we were talking about support for
> dynamically loaded backend extensions.

Hmm, historically ecpg's ecpglib.h includes postgres.h which include
palloc.h. But scanning through postgres.h I wonder why. 

I will check that as soon as I find time.

Michael
-- 
Michael Meskes                         | Go SF 49ers!
Th.-Heuss-Str. 61, D-41812 Erkelenz    | Go Rhein Fire!
Tel.: (+49) 2431/72651                 | Use Debian GNU/Linux!
Email: Michael.Meskes@gmx.net          | Use PostgreSQL!