Re: [HACKERS] Re: Anyone understand shared-memory space usage?

> I think it's entirely likely that this set of bugs can account for flaky
> behavior seen in installations with more than 256 shared-memory buffers
> (postmaster -B > 256), more than 256 simultaneously held locks (have no
> idea how to translate that into user terms), or more than 256 concurrent
> backends.  I'm still wondering whether that might describe Daryl
> Dunbar's problem with locks not getting released, for example.

People have reported sloness/bugs with hash index lookups.  Does this
relate to that?

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us            |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026