Re: [HACKERS] v6.4.3 ?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: [HACKERS] v6.4.3 ?
Дата
Msg-id 199902091638.LAA20421@candle.pha.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] v6.4.3 ?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
> "Thomas G. Lockhart" <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu> writes:
> > Personally, I would choose to post patches, since as you point out we
> > are really focused on v6.5beta. We *still* need a patch convention with
> > a .../patches/ directory shipped with Postgres, and with routines to
> > help create and apply the patches.
> 
> The trouble with maintaining a pile of independent patches is that you
> have cross-patch dependencies: patch B fails to apply unless patch A
> was previously installed, or applies but fails to work right, etc etc.
> Worse, an installation reporting a problem might be running a slightly
> different set of patches than anyone else, complicating the diagnosis
> substantially.

My optimizer fix will not affect other patches.  If we only have a few
patches, they will not bump into each other.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us            |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] samekeys
Следующее
От: jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: AW: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0