Re: [HACKERS] trouble with rules

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: [HACKERS] trouble with rules
Дата
Msg-id 199902081520.KAA14388@candle.pha.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] trouble with rules  (jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck))
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] trouble with rules  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: [HACKERS] trouble with rules  (jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck))
Список pgsql-hackers
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> 
> > This is normally caused by Stephan's patches.  His patches were
> > originally against 6.3, and he ported them to 6.4, but he normally does
> > lots of development without any communication with us, sends us a huge
> > patch, and we normally have to clean up the edges somewhat.  This patch
> > actually caused fewer problems than the HAVING patch he submitted.

> 
>     Porting  his  patch  to  v6.4 was not exactly what he did. He
>     changed the v6.5 tree in a way that his patch fit's into.

Yes, I understand the frustration.  I had that with HAVING.  I
symathize.  It also bothers me when things are added that are disruptive
to other code, and I see he did that.

Should we remove his patch?  I don't know.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us            |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0
Следующее
От: "Thomas G. Lockhart"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] DEC OSF1 Compilation problems