> Not sure. My original choice was to subtract 1 from the calculated
> maximum, which meant it would split just before the 2Gb limit.
>
> However, running with the value set at the lower value:
>
> 1998585856 Feb 8 02:25 /opt/db/base/test/smallcat
> 599007232 Feb 8 03:21 /opt/db/base/test/smallcat.1
>
> Total 26653000 rows loaded
>
> Would anyone really notice the lower value?
>
> Perhaps we could make this another compile time setting, like the block
> size?
I guess all I am saying is I prefer the max-1 value. Seems more
logical. Could be set in config.h.in, though.
-- Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026