I see the problem here too. Reversing it now out.
D'Arcy, do you care to comment?
> Um, I hate to say "I told you so", but this const-addition has
> in fact created more warning messages than it eliminated:
>
> gcc -I../../interfaces/libpq -I../../include -I../../backend -g -O -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -c psql.c -o
psql.o
> psql.c: In function `HandleSlashCmds':
> psql.c:1833: warning: passing arg 1 of `free' discards `const' from pointer target type
> psql.c:2192: warning: passing arg 1 of `free' discards `const' from pointer target type
> psql.c:2257: warning: passing arg 1 of `free' discards `const' from pointer target type
> psql.c:2265: warning: passing arg 1 of `free' discards `const' from pointer target type
> psql.c:2309: warning: passing arg 1 of `free' discards `const' from pointer target type
> psql.c: In function `main':
> psql.c:2982: warning: passing arg 1 of `free' discards `const' from pointer target type
>
> I think this is a fairly graphic demonstration of my assertion that
> adding const to application-visible fields is not entirely transparent.
>
> I would like to back this patch out until such time as we are prepared
> to fully const-ify libpq's interface (eg, declare PQgetvalue and all
> the other accessor functions as returning const char* not just char*).
> We shouldn't annoy application programmers a little bit here and a
> little bit there --- we should go the whole nine yards at once rather
> than forcing them to insert a few more "const"s with each release.
> IMHO, anyway.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
-- Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026