We agreed to skip this right now, right?
> Thus spake Bruce Momjian
> > These are good points. Can you post the patch again? I deleted it.
>
> I bounced it directly to you rather than reposting to the list.
>
> > Sounds like it would be safe. I am interested in const-ify-ing the
> > backend code, if possible. It does offer a level of code checking that
> > we don't currently have.
>
> Me too but as I said, this patch doesn't do that. It only const-ifies
> the the arguments to an external interface.
>
> > The only issue is that is has to be done pretty exhaustively. If you
> > don't, your new const function parameters start passing params to
> > functions that takes non-const params, and warnings start to fly.
>
> I compiled the entire tree without any warnings so I assume that the
> changes wound up being pretty localized.
>
> --
> D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy@{druid|vex}.net> | Democracy is three wolves
> http://www.druid.net/darcy/ | and a sheep voting on
> +1 416 424 2871 (DoD#0082) (eNTP) | what's for dinner.
>
>
-- Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026