Re: [HACKERS] doc/FAQ* files are hosed

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: [HACKERS] doc/FAQ* files are hosed
Дата
Msg-id 199901170143.UAA00861@candle.pha.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на doc/FAQ* files are hosed  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] doc/FAQ* files are hosed  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
> Comparing the current-CVS FAQ files with those in the REL6_4 branch
> is depressing --- almost every one is messed up in one branch or the
> other.
> 
> The main FAQ is newer in the 6.4 branch than in the current branch; the
> 6.4 version seems to have numerous small fixes that are not in the main
> branch.  FAQ_CVS is also newer in 6.4; it's been de-HTMLized in 6.4
> (good) but not in current.  FAQ_HPUX, FAQ_Irix, and FAQ_Linux are
> completely trashed in the 6.4 branch --- all three have been overwritten
> with some generic document.

I must have done that during the 6.4.2 release process.  I decided to
grab them from the web site, but it looks like I got the wrong pages
somehow.

They get over-written with ever release, so I have another chance to try
it for 6.5.


This does not apply to the FAQ_CVS.  That's someone else.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us            |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] 6.4.2 HP-UX makefile problem?
Следующее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Backend crash in opr_sanity regression test.