Re: [HACKERS] COMMIT

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: [HACKERS] COMMIT
Дата
Msg-id 199812130358.WAA13310@candle.pha.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] COMMIT  (Vadim Mikheev <vadim@krs.ru>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] COMMIT  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
> Jan Wieck wrote:
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> >     while on the redolog, I've came across a little detail I'm in
> >     doubt about. Currently it seems, that the 'C' response to the
> >     frontend   is   sent  before  the  transaction  get's  really
> >     committed in the backend. So there is a  little  chance  that
> >     the    backend   dies   between   this   response   and   the
> >     CommitTransaction() call.
> > 
> >     Isn't that the wrong order? As a programmer I  would  assume,
> >     that  if  I have positive response to COMMIT, I can forget my
> >     local data because it made it safely into the database.
> 
> Yes, this should be fixed...

Added to TODO:
* 'C' response returned to fontend before actual data committed


--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us            |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] ecpg man page
Следующее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] weird state after aborted transaction in pgsql 6.4