Re: [HACKERS] Parser bug (?)t

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Parser bug (?)t
Дата
Msg-id 199812061612.LAA13053@candle.pha.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Parser bug (?)  ("Thomas G. Lockhart" <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>)
Список pgsql-hackers
> Speaking of which, are you or Bruce (or anyone else) thinking of testing
> the unsigned int vs size_t for the Size typedef recently mentioned by
> Oliver? Can we count on all platforms to have size_t defined? If so, we
> could consider adding it in for v6.4.1. I'm currently working on getting
> min() and max() to work with string types, but could drop that to polish
> things for a v6.4.1 release.

I think everyone has size_t. It is s POSIX requirement.  Sounds like a
good change.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us            |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Parser bug (?)
Следующее
От: Eric Lee Green
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [INTERFACES] crypt not included when compiling libpgtcl !!!!!!!