Re: SGI Port of Postgresql 6.4 snapshot of 09/28/98

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: SGI Port of Postgresql 6.4 snapshot of 09/28/98
Дата
Msg-id 199810021617.MAA10153@candle.pha.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на SGI Port of Postgresql 6.4 snapshot of 09/28/98  (Robert Bruccoleri <bruc@pluto.njcc.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
I have applied patches 2, 3, and 4.  For patch 1, I changed the 'long
long' in va_arg() to a typedef for 'long long'.  Let me know if that
fixes it.

> Gentlemen:
>     I have tested today's snapshot (retrieved this morning)
> on an SGI Irix 6.2 system with the following results:
>
>     1) The int8 test still fails because the SGI C compiler does
> not handle a variable argument declaration of "long long" correctly in
> the definition of the function dopr in snprintf.c. According to the
> SGI documentation, the handling of "long long" is undefined.  I think
> the best solution is to use sprintf in int8.c, because there is no
> additional value to using snprintf in this context. There is no risk
> over buffer overflow in int8.c because the maximum length of a
> possible result is known in advance (21 characters + one for the null
> termination). I've modified int8.c on my machine accordingly.
>     2) The definition of the slock_t type is incorrect in irix5.h.
>     3) The new locking mechanism using test_and_set subroutine
> calls was tested by running 5 parallel processes, two creating indices
> and three doing sequential scans. All queries completed normally.
>     4) The comment in s_lock.h on possible future SGI locking
> mechanisms should be deleted, since this mechanism is fast, works, and
> is supported by SGI.
>     Patches to make these corrections (except 4) are included below.

>
>     Also, please include the following Makefile.custom into
> the SGI Irix FAQ:
>
> CUSTOM_CC = cc -32 -g
> LD += -32 -g
>
> The "-32" switch is essential, but I haven't tested the need for "-g".
> If I have time before the release, I will report the results. At least,
> I know that this version passes the regression tests.

Please contact the IRIX FAQ maintainer directly.

>
>     Would you please put my name on the list of people who
> contributed to the 6.4 release? Thanks.

Done.

>
> Here are the patches:
>
> *** backend/utils/adt/int8.c.orig        Tue Sep  1 03:01:35 1998
> --- backend/utils/adt/int8.c    Mon Sep 28 21:32:38 1998
> ***************
> *** 66,74 ****
>         if (!PointerIsValid(val))
>                 return NULL;
>
> !       if ((len = snprintf(buf, MAXINT8LEN, INT64_FORMAT, *val)) < 0)
>                 elog(ERROR, "Unable to format int8", NULL);
> -
>         result = palloc(len + 1);
>
>         strcpy(result, buf);
> --- 66,73 ----
>         if (!PointerIsValid(val))
>                 return NULL;
>
> !       if ((len = sprintf(buf, INT64_FORMAT, *val)) < 0)
>                 elog(ERROR, "Unable to format int8", NULL);
>         result = palloc(len + 1);
>
>         strcpy(result, buf);
> *** include/port/irix5.h.orig    Sun Sep  7 00:59:54 1997
> --- include/port/irix5.h        Mon Sep 28 19:37:12 1998
> ***************
> *** 3,7 ****
>   #define NO_EMPTY_STMTS
>   #define SYSV_DIRENT
>   #define HAS_TEST_AND_SET
> ! #include <abi_mutex.h>
> ! typedef abilock_t slock_t;
> --- 3,6 ----
>   #define NO_EMPTY_STMTS
>   #define SYSV_DIRENT
>   #define HAS_TEST_AND_SET
> ! typedef unsigned long slock_t;
> *** include/storage/s_lock.h.orig        Mon Sep 21 03:00:17 1998
> --- include/storage/s_lock.h    Mon Sep 28 19:37:12 1998
> ***************
> *** 259,266 ****
>   #if defined(__sgi)
>   /*
>    * SGI IRIX 5
> !  * slock_t is defined as a struct abilock_t, which has a single unsigned long
> !  * member.
>    *
>    * This stuff may be supplemented in the future with Masato Kataoka's MIPS-II
>    * assembly from his NECEWS SVR4 port, but we probably ought to retain this
> --- 259,269 ----
>   #if defined(__sgi)
>   /*
>    * SGI IRIX 5
> !  * slock_t is defined as a unsigned long. We use the standard SGI
> !  * mutex API.
> !  *
> !  * The following comment is left for historical reasons, but is probably
> !  * not a good idea since the mutex ABI is supported.
>    *
>    * This stuff may be supplemented in the future with Masato Kataoka's MIPS-II
>    * assembly from his NECEWS SVR4 port, but we probably ought to retain this
>
> +------------------------------------------+------------------------------+
> | Robert E. Bruccoleri, Ph.D.              | Associate Research Professor |
> | phone: 732 235 5796                      | Center for Advanced          |
> | Fax:   732 235 4850                      |   Biotechnology and Medicine |
> | email: bruc@acm.org                      | Rutgers University           |
> | URL:   http://www.cabm.rutgers.edu/~bruc | 679 Hoes Lane                |
> |                                          | Piscataway, NJ 08854-5638    |
> +------------------------------------------+------------------------------+
>


--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle
  maillist@candle.pha.pa.us            |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.4 items
Следующее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Patch - please apply