Re: [GENERAL] Long update query ?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: [GENERAL] Long update query ?
Дата
Msg-id 199810012254.SAA18974@candle.pha.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на RE: [GENERAL] Long update query ?  ("Taral" <taral@mail.utexas.edu>)
Ответы Re: [GENERAL] Long update query ? (also Re: [GENERAL] CNF vs. DNF)  ("Taral" <taral@mail.utexas.edu>)
Список pgsql-general
[Charset iso-8859-1 unsupported, filtering to ASCII...]
> > This is caused by a semi-well known weakness in the optimizer.
> > The optimizer
> > rewrites the WHERE clause in conjunctive normal form (CNF):
> >
> >    (A and B) or (C and D) ==>  (A or C) and (A or D) and (B or C)
> > and (B or D)
> >
>
> Wouldn't disjunctive normal form be better, since it can be implemented as
> the simple union of a set of small queries?

Please tell us more.

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle
  maillist@candle.pha.pa.us            |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026


В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Anand Surelia
Дата:
Сообщение: Help SPI
Следующее
От: "Taral"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [GENERAL] Long update query ? (also Re: [GENERAL] CNF vs. DNF)