Re: [HACKERS] Re: type coersion (was OR clause status)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Re: type coersion (was OR clause status)
Дата
Msg-id 199808232212.SAA23787@candle.pha.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Re: type coersion (was OR clause status)  ("Thomas G. Lockhart" <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>)
Список pgsql-hackers
> OK, I've just committed to the source tree changes for looking for
> binary-compatible indices when either the left- or right-hand side of
> the restriction clause is a constant.
>
> I've #ifndef'd them so we can disable it if necessary. But, all of the
> regression tests pass, except for the select_view test, which has been
> core dumping for weeks. Anyone else seeing that, or is it just me? :(

Is this fixed?  Are there any open problems with the regress tests?

--
Bruce Momjian                          |  830 Blythe Avenue
maillist@candle.pha.pa.us              |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  (610) 353-9879(w)
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  (610) 853-3000(h)

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Oleg Bartunov
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] initdb problem
Следующее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Autoconf'd test for int64