Re: Rules and views (was Re: [HACKERS] Rules: 2nd patch)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Keith Parks
Тема Re: Rules and views (was Re: [HACKERS] Rules: 2nd patch)
Дата
Msg-id 199808192306.AAA02549@mtcc.demon.co.uk
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Rules and views (was Re: [HACKERS] Rules: 2nd patch)  (jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck))
Список pgsql-hackers
Hi,

I vote to make them builtins too.

    Keith.

Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>
>
> >     If nobody votes against, I would like to make  them  builtins
> >     as  pg_get_ruledef()  and pg_get_viewdef() and then setup the
> >     appropriate views  (pg_rule  and  pg_view)  in  template1  by
> >     initdb  like we do it with pg_user. It cannot break anything,
> >     except that a rule action the  two  functions  cannot  handle
> >     will  make  the new views unusable.  But it would be a really
> >     powerful possibility for pg_dump or just useful to  see  what
> >     that damn event qual and parsetree's in pg_rewrite came from.
> >
> >     Comments?
> >
>
> Go, Jan, go.
>


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Garrett Wollman
Дата:
Сообщение: More complete indexing for geometric types?
Следующее
От: t-ishii@sra.co.jp
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: new MB patch and pg_type oid problem