Name type vs. char *

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Name type vs. char *
Дата
Msg-id 199807200448.AAA17784@candle.pha.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Name type vs. char *
Список pgsql-hackers
We currently use Name sometimes, and char* other times to store
relation, attribute, type, and view names.

One thing Mariposa did was to make that more consistent, so you passed
around Name(NameData pointers) instead of the more generic char *.
However, the Name fields behave like char*, but are clearer.

    typedef struct nameData
    {
        char        data[NAMEDATALEN];
    } NameData;
    typedef NameData *Name;

Do people see value in making this switch?  Would take me a few hours to
make the change.

--
Bruce Momjian                          |  830 Blythe Avenue
maillist@candle.pha.pa.us              |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  (610) 353-9879(w)
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  (610) 853-3000(h)

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Vadim Mikheev
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] proposals for LLL, part 1
Следующее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Name type vs. char *