Re: [HACKERS] Revised proposal for libpq and FE/BE protocol changes

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Revised proposal for libpq and FE/BE protocol changes
Дата
Msg-id 199805221416.KAA28979@candle.pha.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Revised proposal for libpq and FE/BE protocol changes  (dg@illustra.com (David Gould))
Список pgsql-hackers
> Database customers at least in the commercial world can be incredibly
> conservative. It is not at all uncommon to have large sites running DBMS
> engines that are three major releases (ie, well over three years) old.
> Once they get an app working, they really don't want anything to change.

Yes, this is true.  Their data is locked in Our database.  And you can't
just restart it like a PC OS or word processor.  Database demands are
much different.

--
Bruce Momjian                          |  830 Blythe Avenue
maillist@candle.pha.pa.us              |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  (610) 353-9879(w)
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  (610) 853-3000(h)

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Revised proposal for libpq and FE/BE protocol changes
Следующее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] sorting big tables :(