Re: [HACKERS] Time to fix libpgtcl for async NOTIFY

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Time to fix libpgtcl for async NOTIFY
Дата
Msg-id 199805220436.AAA19514@candle.pha.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Time to fix libpgtcl for async NOTIFY  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-interfaces
> There's some risk of breaking existing applications, since the apps
> might not be prepared for pg_listen callbacks occurring except at the
> specific time they execute pg_notifies.  But that doesn't seem really
> likely to be a problem.  Besides, since both these commands are
> undocumented, I imagine not very many libpgtcl applications use them.
> (A quick search of the archives turned up only a message from Massimo
> Dal Zotto about this topic, and he seemed to agree that getting rid of
> pg_notifies would be better.)
>
> Any comments?

Yep, get rid of the old stuff.  I am sure people didn't use it because
of the performance problem.  Your cleanup will make it use-able.

--
Bruce Momjian                          |  830 Blythe Avenue
maillist@candle.pha.pa.us              |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  (610) 353-9879(w)
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  (610) 853-3000(h)

В списке pgsql-interfaces по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Time to fix libpgtcl for async NOTIFY
Следующее
От: dg@illustra.com (David Gould)
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Revised proposal for libpq and FE/BE protocol changes