Re: AW: [HACKERS] mmap and MAP_ANON

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: AW: [HACKERS] mmap and MAP_ANON
Дата
Msg-id 199805141455.KAA09202@candle.pha.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на AW: [HACKERS] mmap and MAP_ANON  (Andreas Zeugswetter <andreas.zeugswetter@telecom.at>)
Список pgsql-hackers
>
> >> - Could we use mmap:ing of files at a higher level then
> >>   src/backend/strorage/ipc/ipc.c to get even better performance
> >>   and cleaness?
> >
> >Yes, we could use mmap() to map the actual files.  I will post time
> >timings on this soon.
>
> I do not think this will be a practicable solution, since it would mean the whole db
> has to mmap'ed. This means there has to be enough virtual memory to hold
> the complete database, or at least one table at a time. Or do I understand this wrong ??

We can map parts of the table, even in 8k chunks.  However, looking at
my sequential scan timing tests, it would be slower.

--
Bruce Momjian                          |  830 Blythe Avenue
maillist@candle.pha.pa.us              |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  (610) 353-9879(w)
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  (610) 853-3000(h)

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: darcy@druid.net (D'Arcy J.M. Cain)
Дата:
Сообщение: char(8) vs char8
Следующее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Sequential scan speed, mmap, disk i/o