>
> >
> > OK, here is my argument for inlining tas().
>
> I am going out of town till Monday, so don't have time to give this
> the thoughtful response it deserves. I will get back to you on this as
> I am not quite convinced, but obviously in the face of this I need to
> explain my reasoning.
Sure. I just know that the reduction from 0.28 to 0.08 was performed
one 0.01 at a time. See the MemSet() macro. I am sure you will hate it
too, but it did reduce the number of calls to memset() and reduced
wallclock execution time as measured from the client.
--
Bruce Momjian | 830 Blythe Avenue
maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
+ If your life is a hard drive, | (610) 353-9879(w)
+ Christ can be your backup. | (610) 853-3000(h)