Re: [HACKERS] Buffer overuns with the Electric fence debugging library

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Buffer overuns with the Electric fence debugging library
Дата
Msg-id 199803181546.KAA13109@candle.pha.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Buffer overuns with the Electric fence debugging library  ("Maurice Gittens" <mgittens@gits.nl>)
Список pgsql-hackers
>
> Hi everybody,
>
> The electricfence library is a tool which helps us to detect
> buffer overruns in C programs.
>
> Linking Postgresql with this library gives at least 3 errors I have found
> until now.
>
> The errors manifest themselves in sql statements like:
> 1. create table test(f1 int);
> This one allways fails.
> 2. select * from pg_shadow
> Only some tables give errors so the problem seems to be related
> to the type/alignment of fields in the tables.
>
> The errors are all found in the DataFill function called from
> heap_from_tuple.
>
> I'm using a snapshot version of postgresql downloaded around
> the release date 6.3.
>
> This all is on Linux (Redhat 4.0) with Electric Fence version 2.0.5.
>
> Do you guys feel comfortable with a database which has reproducible
> buffer overuns?
>
> I think it would be great is somebody who has more experience with
> postgresql than I were to look at this.
>
> I am now going to do some work which I actually get paid to do!
>
> With regards from Maurice.
>
>
>
>

Can you send us the lines that cause the problem?  I will look at them.
I have electric fence here on BSDI, but it really takes some time to
run.

--
Bruce Momjian                          |  830 Blythe Avenue
maillist@candle.pha.pa.us              |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  (610) 353-9879(w)
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  (610) 853-3000(h)

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Thomas G. Lockhart"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Unix Domain Sockets error (was Re: [HACKERS] Alpha initdb fixed!)
Следующее
От: "Thomas G. Lockhart"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] standards question