Re: [HACKERS] Unique index using hash?
| От | Bruce Momjian |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Unique index using hash? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 199803170302.WAA01018@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Unique index using hash? (ocie@paracel.com) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
>
> I was playing around with my latest compile and tried to make a unique
> index on two columns, using a hash method. Both of these (more than
> one column and unique) are currently not allowed for hash indexes.
>
> I thought about this for a bit and realized that making a NESTED hash
> index (index on a and b also serves as an index on a) would be a
> trick, but allowing the unique clause should not be a problem.
>
> Therefore, I would like to try implementing unique constraints on hash
> indexes. Has this come up before? Are there any reasons not to
> support this? As far as I understand, specifying an index method is
> non standard (above and beyond standard) to begin with.
>
It is on the TODO list:
* add UNIQUE capability to non-btree indexes
--
Bruce Momjian | 830 Blythe Avenue
maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
+ If your life is a hard drive, | (610) 353-9879(w)
+ Christ can be your backup. | (610) 853-3000(h)
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: