Re: [HACKERS] PL/pgSQL - for discussion

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: [HACKERS] PL/pgSQL - for discussion
Дата
Msg-id 199803121740.MAA02751@candle.pha.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на PL/pgSQL - for discussion  (jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck))
Список pgsql-hackers
>
> Hi,
>
>     as  I  proposed,  I'm  now  starting on the PL/pgSQL loadable
>     procedural language. As far as I'm now I  have  a  pl_handler
>     with  an  independent  flex/bison  parser  that  can  parse a
>     rudimentary implementation of the language. The next step  is
>     to  start  on the PL/pgSQL executor and look if the generated
>     instruction tree can be used (up to now the  pl_handler  only
>     dumps the instruction tree and returns a 0 Datum.
>
>     If  that  works  I'll  expand  the scanner/parser to the full
>     PL/plSQL language including trigger procedures.
>
>     But I would like to have some discussion on language  itself.
>     So  I wrote down what I had in mind. The document is appended
>     below.
>
>     Please comment/suggest !

Gee, it looks really nice.  I have never used such an advanced language
INSIDE a database engine.

--
Bruce Momjian                          |  830 Blythe Avenue
maillist@candle.pha.pa.us              |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  (610) 353-9879(w)
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  (610) 853-3000(h)

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] initdb and xpg_user
Следующее
От: ocie@paracel.com
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [QUESTIONS] Does Storage Manager support >2GB tables?