Re: [HACKERS] varchar() vs char16 performance

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: [HACKERS] varchar() vs char16 performance
Дата
Msg-id 199803121407.JAA17163@candle.pha.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] varchar() vs char16 performance  (Andrew Martin <martin@biochemistry.ucl.ac.uk>)
Список pgsql-hackers
> If char2 et al are going completely from 6.4, I think it would be sensible
> for pg_dump to filter these types and change them to char(2) et al when
> it writes the CREATE statments.
>

That is an interesting idea, but what about applications that use them?
I think we can have the parser change them for one release, then drop
them completely.

--
Bruce Momjian                          |  830 Blythe Avenue
maillist@candle.pha.pa.us              |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  (610) 353-9879(w)
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  (610) 853-3000(h)

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [QUESTIONS] Does Storage Manager support >2GB tables?
Следующее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [QUESTIONS] Does Storage Manager support >2GB tables?