> Probably the strongest solution would be to copy the entire parse tree.
> Is there already a function to do that? It seems like it would be a lot
> of work to start this from scratch.
>
> Another possible solution would be to have transformExpr() accept a
> previously transformed parse tree without damaging it. A simple minded
> fix having transformExpr() ignore the T_Const (the "105" node in the
> example) and T_Var nodes did not work.
>
> Yet another solution would be to have transformExpr() replicate parse
> trees instead of having gram.y do it.
>
> Any thoughts on this?
I am sure copyfuncs.c has some function to do this, but these are
parse-specific structures. Not sure if they do have such functions. I
considered the reuse a possible problem when I wrote the code, but could
not find any problems, so I left it.
--
Bruce Momjian | 830 Blythe Avenue
maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
+ If your life is a hard drive, | (610) 353-9879(w)
+ Christ can be your backup. | (610) 853-3000(h)