Re: [HACKERS] Heh, the disappearing problem!

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Karl Denninger
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Heh, the disappearing problem!
Дата
Msg-id 19980309221555.63948@mcs.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Heh, the disappearing problem!  (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Heh, the disappearing problem!  (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Re: [HACKERS] Heh, the disappearing problem!  (Maarten Boekhold <maartenb@dutepp2.et.tudelft.nl>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Mar 09, 1998 at 11:05:49PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > I've seen this same kind of behavior in a few other places as well; in
> > places where you are doing reads and writes in a mixed environment (ie: read
> > something, write something (typically in a different table) based on what
> > you read) performance of 6.3 has gone in the toilet.  Update jobs that used
> > to run in tens of seconds are requiring several minutes to complete now.
> >
> > And again, we're not seeing much disk I/O during this period - but we *ARE*
> > seeing a hell of a lot of CPU activity, almost all in user mode.
>
> OK, how about using postgres -t option or profiling to get the function
> using so much cpu?  This may help us tell where the problem lies.  Does
> anyone else see such problems?  All other reports I hear was that 6.3
> was faster.

Docs on this somewhere?

I'll be happy to profile it if I can figure out how! :-)

--
--
Karl Denninger (karl@MCS.Net)| MCSNet - Serving Chicagoland and Wisconsin
http://www.mcs.net/          | T1's from $600 monthly to FULL DS-3 Service
                 | NEW! K56Flex support on ALL modems
Voice: [+1 312 803-MCS1 x219]| EXCLUSIVE NEW FEATURE ON ALL PERSONAL ACCOUNTS
Fax:   [+1 312 803-4929]     | *SPAMBLOCK* Technology now included at no cost

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Brett McCormick
Дата:
Сообщение: postgres/alpha problems
Следующее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Why no Oracle, Sybase, Informix etc.